Tuesday 24 May 2016

What women should learn from the Cheryl Kitonga story

Women have always been told Beauty without brains is vanity.The overnight famous Cheryl Kitonga is yet to attest to this. When I heard Kitonga's duplex mode of communication over the phone with the taxi guy, I easily deduced that Kitonga is a lady of modest education. Her incoherence in talking easily tells you that she is a woman of fair knowledge. This brings us to two sides of a coin in this mystery. The first side of her coin is the innocence side and being just a victim of a confluence of circumstances. The other twist, is her involvement in the underworld. If she appears in the previous she is safe, if she appears in the latter, her freedom is at peril and perhaps she could be the only lead to the shortest path of unravelling the truth. She is the person that could bring trails of evidences to a converge.That is if she is guilty. From my own judgements if Kitonga is to be intensely grilled over her snare in this mess, her ignorance will be her shackles. It is conventional that it easier to squeeze out information from a less learned person In comparison to a very witty one. Kitonga's eventuality as per now is two,only if she is guilty. ONE, if investigative apparatus are genuine with their endeavours and not arm-twisted from an external force as has been claimed, and Kitonga questioned, Juma's assassins could be put on a bright spotlight and Kitonga vindicated with her accomplices, TWO, if the assasins on watch quickly play defensive before Kitonga opens up the skeleton closet due to her ignorance, she will be held captive and become another statistics of mysterious disappearings like the herdsboy at the terrains where Ouko was dumped.Such is Kitonga's fate.Her tomorrow dangles on either sides of these TWO beams. Let us wish her well, we all hope she was innocent and just a regular clande catering her client conjugal needs for a pay and nothing short of that.
But Mohammed Ali's trajectory in his search for justice looks more cajoled rather than one with the intent of bringing matters to conclusion. It raises eyebrows why Ali and Onsarigo fail to interview the lady at the centrestage of this melodrama? Why did they only interview appendages to the murder eg guards? What reasons prevented them from criss-crossing this lady? Or if she was probed why was it censored from public view? Have these journalists whetted the Art of hoding at a ransom assassins?
‪#‎Jacob_aftermath


No comments: